Written by: (@QuintLyn) | September 25, 2012 3:10 pm

8 Comments

We tend to talk about free to play gaming quite a bit here and part of the reason that we do is because developers keep bringing it up.  Whether or not players agree, developers and publishers are seeing it as a viable form of monetization — as long as they can figure out how to make it fit the game.

The topic came up once again when StarCraft 2 lead designer Dustin Browder admitted that Blizzard is “looking at free to play as an option for the multiplayer,” during a panel at the Valencia eSports Congress.

However, the team just isn’t sure how to go about making money from it.  According to Browder:

We don’t know how we would monetise it. While it might be good fun for me to play against someone with only half the units available to them, that’s not going to be an enjoyable experience for them.

I have to admit, this does seem like a bit of an issue.   StarCraft 2 is vastly different from other competitive free to play offerings like League of Legends and SMITE where the a steady stream of new champions (or gods) will allow the companies to easily monetize the game and still keep things fairly even.

However, there is the option of the cosmetic route.  The question is: Would skins and other cosmetics bring in enough cash from SC2 players?

Blizzard Considers Free To Play Star Craft 2

  • Nick Cattane

    I love sc2 and would definitely consider buying some cool skins.

  • Deathstar2x

    SC2 already have a Starter Edition, which the free-to-play version would probably replace.

    Also, link should be smitegame dot com.

  • http://twitter.com/SAdwayneIE Dwayne Jenkins

    I was chatting about this with mates. We were wondering if they would make it similar to the single player campaign, where you can select different upgrades to take onto the battlefield. We thought they might make the upgrades achievement based or purchase based. So you could pay or play to unlock different upgrades, but that those upgrades were not necessarily better just different, adding more strategic variety to the game play without making it pay to win. So with the basic “build” you could compete but your strategy options would be limited. I think they could do this without alternating or massively overhauling the foundations they have currently.

    • Nick Cattane

      Nobody could compete on any competitive level without having access to all units/upgrades.  So, good idea, but I think it is fundamentally flawed.

  • http://twitter.com/HallusH HallusH

    carmac just did realtalk with jp 2days before the event and even he came up with best f2p for them to make multiplayer Free for all. and that will help to sell the story mission.
    and that’s like general idia that was put in 2mins on the fly.
    so how come blizzard can’t do 1+1
    cause lets be real here the numbers of RTS players isn’t any where close to FPS/MMO/RPG atm. unless you live in south korea.
    starcraft 2 no way will be compered to LoL / dota 2 F2P. cause that will be just bad.
    so in order for blizzard to expand starcraft 2 so every random joe will be able to pick it up at try it.
    and i believe that any new player to the genre oh RTS will want to drop money and upgrade to full version to get the for story first.
    FYI. there’s a trail option at this point for starcraft 2. which you get like few mission and can do like up to few online games.
    unless they will start selling out “playtime packs” which will be really bad imo.
    “but if no one buys the compain mode” i played LoL and play dota2. never got a single cash item.
    however i recommanded the game to like 20 people. and they got it cause it’s free.
    so if blizzard really want to expand thier esports game to make it have have a bigger market and bigger fan base. they have to do it.
    no new player will go and buy the base game + the new expansion. to play a game that he never played before. that’s like 100$ investion into something that he might not like.
    so the game should have a price point where they will go pay like 20$ for multiplayer,
    and that is like the max price imo that someone will go and drop on multiplayer only game these days.
    and when it comes to level and matchmaking it’s already there. so unless that one guy is really good after he just picked up the game and beats stephano with one hand.
    he will stay at the skill level that fits his playstyle and it doesn’t messes up anything for the top players / communities.
    p.s. there’s already many great game that just got out dated at this point. and where droped from any major tournament. such as counter strike 1.6, queke, broodwar, dota, unreal tournament, painkiller etc.. because these games are outdated. for reason of viewership and interese by in this game by player numbers.

  • http://twitter.com/justQQing Brian Day

    so what about the people who have payed for the box …….,bliz fuck us over again

  • Jado Cast

    I really loved StarCraft, but SC2 disappointed me.  The story was okay, but short.  I felt like that’s what I’m buying.  So if they want to make the multi-player free and you buy add-ons and campaign then its okay with me but I hope they keep an upgrade option to buy all the expansion items in one discounted amount instead of buying in piecemeal.  

  • Geibix

    back in the dayz of SC 1  , there was an option , kind of ” Spawn Install “  . if you have the original game and you wanna play against your friends , you were able to install the multiplayer part of the game on a second PC and beat the crap out of them :)
    D2 had an option for mplayer too , but i cant remember if the effect was the same.
    greetz from germany and sry for my bad english

RECOMMENDED FOR YOU
Take a Poll

What Is Your Most Anticipated MMO?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
Monday
6 pst

The Republic

Star Wars The Old Republic

Tuesday
9:30 pst

After Dark

Live Call In Show

n/a

Monty's Minute

Have Questions? He Has Answers

Wednesday
3 pst

OMGLOL

League Of Legends Drama

6 pst

Guildcast

Guild Wars 2

8 pst

Klaus & Squirrel

Gameplay Duo

Thursday
8 pst

Legendary

World of WarCraft

Friday
3 pst

TWIMMO

This Week In MMO



TOP GAMES
Guild Wars 2 MMO News
Genre: MMORPG Fantasy
Developer: Arenanet
Metacritic Score: 90
The Elder Scrolls Online MMORPG News
Genre: MMORPG Fantasy
Developer: Zenimax
Metacritic Score: n/a
World of Warcraft MMO News
Genre: MMORPG Fantasy
Developer: Blizzard
Metacritic Score: 82
SWTOR MMO News
Genre: MMORPG SciFi
Developer: Bioware
Metacritic Score: 85
League of Legends News
Genre: MOBA
Developer: Riot
Metacritic Score: 78