Legendary 78: Diablo III Causes World of Warcraft Account Concerns

Written by: (@jarimor) | May 27, 2012 8:39 am

39 Comments

Fighting demons can be bad for your health.

And your account.

With the incredible popularity of the Annual Pass for World of Warcraft players, it’s no surprise that a lot of you are playing some Diablo III at the moment. Unfortunately it seems that a threat much more dangerous than your average demon has risen: account theft.

Accusations of accounts being stolen even with an authenticator have been officially denied by Blizzard, does this ease fears or just make people worry all the more?

Lead Content Designer Cory Stockton has revealed that the limit on daily quests will be a thing of the past in Mists of Pandaria — at max level anyway. This is due to an influx of hundreds of new dailies to keep you logging in. You will be able to do a massive amount of dailies soon!

Yay?

Speaking of dailies, we’re still waiting to see the Tillers quests. Apparently Bliz is working hard on making sure they’re just right. For all the fun we’ve made of WoW-Farmville is this an indication that farming will be something more than just a few more dailies in MoP?

Apparently, the ability to “blacklist” battlegrounds might be coming with MoP. Will this be a welcome convenience or just an excuse for Alliance to avoid everything but Alterac Valley?

Just joking.

Mainly.

Throw in dragon turtles — for pandas on the move, but not that eager to get anywhere — and a plethora of viewer questions and our crew has a lot on their hands tonight.

Thankfully we’ve called in reinforcements.

Joining Gary Gannon are Wowhead‘s — and of course GAMEBREAKER’s — tyro Mike Schaffnit, TankSpot‘s Josh “Lore” Allen and The Daily Blink‘s Chris “Skippy’ Hanel for this week’s hell-bound Legendary!

 

Legendary 78: Diablo III Causes World of Warcraft Account Concerns

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Guillaume-Breton/689456555 Guillaume Breton

    thank god you fixed the breathing at the start i was about to close the video ! hehe

    • http://twitter.com/ChrisHanel Chris Hanel

      Sorry, that was 100% my bad… won’t happen again. :(

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Hamad-Ali-Al-Jalahma/512893526 Hamad Ali Al-Jalahma

    Epic episode, keep up the good work guys

  • http://twitter.com/Deadalon Deadalon

    Diablo “trying to be fun”…. Really ?   It would NOT have been more fun without Server issues ?   It was NEVER about fun.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/John-Sardella/1422784105 John Sardella

    Yeah, my best friend who I went to high school with and drinks with me every friday totally lied to me about getting his account hacked so I would spend 100k gold on items that were worse than he had because Blizz can’t screw up right?

    /sarcasm

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Sven-Jack-Cept-Janssen/1473006061 Sven Jack Cept Janssen

     hanel  totaly made this show- ..talk about balancing classes !!  brought out the best in everyone and nice to have some one representing for positive and optermistic changes that blizz endevour to make ..the 4th spot fight is on!!  – imo gary/lore/mikeB with alternating weekly spots for the hanel and shaff..although i do love the mage druid battle they have going on ..maybe more weeks with them both in too ( 5mans groups?? ) ..gd work fellas keep it up.

  • Old Ben

    Most password “hacks” are done through sharing, keylogging or phishing, with a small minority done by hacking 3rd party sites and hoping that some idiots used the same e-mail / password combination on that site that they used for their Battle.Net account.

    I know that Curse, Elitist Jerks and Wowhead have all had their users’ e-mail addresses harvested (although they’re not supposed to be publicly accessible), so it’s not inconceivable that they’ve also had password hashes exposed. Short password + rainbow table = relatively easy to find their actual password. And if they used the same combo somewhere else, they’re screwed.

    Hacking the actual Battle.Net user database is virtually impossible (even for Battle.Net employees – although they can manipulate your character’s inventory directly, so they wouldn’t need to log in as you anyway). 

    • H S

       It’s already been admitted by one of the leading gold sellers that 3rd party site hacking is the vast majority of account theft now. If you use your ingame password on any site, you are far more likely to be hacked.

      Just google youtube “chinese gold farmer tells all”

      • Old Ben

        > Just google youtube “chinese gold farmer tells al”

        Assuming you’re talking about Psigoda, he’s actually neither chinese nor a gold farmer. He’s a gold broker, who buys gold (and items) from players and farmers, and then sells it to other players (keeping a percentage, of course).

        And he’s clearly not very well informed about how in-game transactions or login credentials work. 

        For example, at one point he talks about how Blizzard “uses certain patterns to find out who the gold sellers are”.

        Patterns? All Blizzard needs to do is go to his website and buy $20 worth of gold. Then see which character actually sends them the gold, and track it back from there. That’s it. Blizzard (or any other developer) can track down and close any account used for farming or selling in a matter of minutes.

        The only reason why he stays in business is that Blizzard knows some people will only play WoW (and pay their subscription) as long as they have access to easy gold, and they’re not going to risk losing those subscribers by banning gold sellers (in fact, the gold sellers _also_ pay a subscription, so Blizzard wins twice).

        > It’s already been admitted by one of the leading gold sellers
        > that 3rd party site hacking is the vast majority of account theft now.

        Again, he seems a bit confused about that, and at one point admits he’s had his account hacked because he used his WoW login info on “every fansite” (so he’s kind of admitting that he’s a moron, and probably projecting onto everyone else).

        While some small sites might store passwords in plaintext, making them good targets for hackers (that’s assuming the site wasn’t set up by account thieves to begin with, which would really mean there’s no “hacking” involved and it’s really just a phishing site), any decent-sized fan site is likely to be running established software (WordPress, phpBB, vBulletin, etc.).

        And none of those packages stores the actual user passwords. They store password hashes, which can take ages to decode. Short passwords can be decoded quickly with a little trick (called rainbow tables), but longer passwords need to be decrypted using dictionary attacks or brute-force. This is much faster to do locally (after you’ve obtained the website’s database) than over the net, but it’s still too slow to be practical.

        This means it’s far preferable to get people to actually type in their password somewhere (where you can catch it in plaintext).

        And people who use their Battle.Net password on 3rd party sites are certainly stupid enough to click “free mount” links on e-mails, log in from (easily keyloggable) internet cafés, or follow links posted in game chat by someone called “u$er_$upport_admin_totally_not_fake”.

        As I mentioned before, I know Wowhead, Curse and Elitist Jerks have had their user databases harvested. I actually warned the admins about this, but they never bothered to warn their users (probably because they want to pretend it never happened – that’s assuming they didn’t actually sell those databases for profit). I have no idea if the harvesters got the password hashes or not, but I get regular e-mails on my unique Curse / Wowhead / EJ e-mail addresses trying to get me to visit their websites, that look like the WoW / Runescape / etc. log-in pages, so they can catch my plaintext password.

        So, while Psigoda’s suggestion (force users to change their password every month) would certainly be helpful, it wouldn’t get rid of phishing, which requires almost zero effort on the part of the account thieves. 

        Ultimately, as stated in Murphy’s Law of Economics, maybe it’s morally wrong to let suckers keep their own gold. ;-)

        • H S

          So in other words, you didnt watch what he said. He is a seller or a broker, semantics be damned. He made a very clear case that those gettting rich are the harvesters who hack game sites.

          • Old Ben

            > So in other words, you didnt watch what
            > he said. [...] He made a very clear case that [...]

            I can’t watch he says, but I can and did hear it. And to “make a very clear case” one needs to present some evidence, which he did not. And since selling gold is his source of income, he’s obviously not going to say anything that _really_ jeopardises that.

            I have some experience dealing with account hacking (not in WoW, but in some websites that store credit card info), and 9 out of 10 cases were the result of phishing. It’s by far the easiest way to get someone’s plaintext password or other personal details.

            > All of my old guild was hacked, and the one common
            > factor was a single password used.

            Where?

          • H S

            All Ican tell you is our guild was a big gold buying group, which is why I now laugh at people who claim other games are buy to win, since WoW was one of the biggest versions of that.

            Im saying over a time of a year and a half, nearly every one of them were hacked except for a few of us. I dont know if all of them used the same passwords, all I do know is the few who didnt, were the eight I mentioned. Since D3, the few that hadn’t been hacked yet are now saying they had issues with it in D3.

          • Old Ben

            > I dont know if all of them used
            > the same passwords, all I do
            > know is the few who didnt

            If you KNOW those eight were the only ones who _didn’t_ use their WoW passwords elsewhere, that means you know all the other ones did. 

            And if you KNOW their passwords were hacked from their accounts on a 3rd party site, then you must know what site that was.

            If none of that is true after all, then I have no idea what your point is / was. For all you know, all the ones who got “hacked” actually typed their password in voluntarily at some phishing site, which means there was no “hacking” involved, just human stupidity. 

            > Since D3, the few that hadn’t
            > been hacked claiming authenticators
            > were why they were safe [...]

            Wait, so some of the ones who weren’t “hacked” had authenticators? But in your previous message you said this:

            > And FYI, not a sinlge one of
            > us eight [the only ones not
            > hacked] used authenticators

            I think you’re either having memory problems or some difficulty building a narrative.

            > if I had to guess which site,
            > I would probably say it was
            > the guilds old site.

            I feel the following question might be purely rhetorical at this point, but: Who was responsible for setting up / managing that website?

          • H S

             NO i said the eight who didnt get hacked  never used authenticators.

            As for the site, really, how should I know what site hacker used. Our guild site was pretty poorly protected and even was hacked by a turkish group at one time.

          • Old Ben

            The story seems to get more and more vague with each message.

  • Sar_Chasm

    Is it me or does Skippy have a Jeff Goldblum aura about him?

  • http://twitter.com/Deadalon Deadalon

    About all the new stuff in MOP. One word.  Archelology. 

    Creating MEANINGFULL content is not done in few months.  

    No limits on daily quests ?  I didnt’ like to do 10…  Burned out in a week the new thing in WOW now I guess…  

    • Old Ben

      And the sadder part about archeology is that they had been talking about it (and so, presumably, designing it) for years and years.

      And the result was “click, move a bit, click, move a bit, click, move a bit…”.

  • Old Ben

    Blacklisting battlegrounds seems like a bad solution for an interface flaw.

    They should simply let people queue for as many battlegrounds as they wanted (and even queue for BGs and dungeons at the same time). That way they could simply leave the ones they want to avoid unselected.

    And if people wanted the extra rewards of a fully random choice, well, then they’d have to be prepared to deal with the consequences of a fully random choice. That’s kind of the point of picking the “random” options, right? You have to be risking something. If you’re not risking anything, why are you getting extra rewards…?

    • http://profile.yahoo.com/YSVAPKVBUPTX6YS3W2DLPOBNN4 AlokP

      I’d sort of agree if the philosophy of Blizz on random BGs was a risk/reward analysis for queuing random. Instead, Blizz’s idea has been to make it easier to get conquest points via randoms so that people can “play how they want to play.” It’s all about delivering the rewards in different ways, and the blacklist is a way of streamlining that. Also, I hate AV when I random queue, because 1) it’s long and I have less of an outcome on the result, whereas I can somewhat carry a WSG or AB with 2 or 3 competent people, 2) 40 people in a pug with actual objectives is like herding cats and not fun for the person who is there for the, say, 200 CP they need to reach their weekly caps. Easiest solution: let me reach my CP cap with just arenas, kthx.

      • Old Ben

        > make it easier to get conquest points via randoms
        > so that people can “play how they want to play.”

        Then simply let people queue for all the battlegrounds they like, while avoiding all the ones they don’t. The blacklisting of two BGs is an (awkward) solution to a problem created by a flaw in the BG selection interface.

        > It’s all about delivering the rewards in different ways,

        That is part of the problem with WoW’s design as a whole (since WotLK, anyway); people play through dungeons, BGs and arenas to get the carrot at the end (points, badges, gear, whatever), not because they actually enjoy the experience (*). In fact, the actual time spent playing the game seems to be a sacrifice that people endure in exchange for the moment when they finally get their ilevel up by 0.5%.

        But hey, with the quality of most recent content (cough*DragonSoul*cough), that’s hardly surprising. Not exactly Karazhan, is it?

        Anyway, except for one of my (many, many) characters, I didn’t care much about the competitive aspect of PvP, so I couldn’t care less about conquest points. I played to have fun, and AV was actually one of my favorite BGs because it was less repetitive, and in some areas felt almost like open-world PvP.

        > let me reach my CP cap with just arenas, kthx.

        Absolutely. The play style of arenas and BGs is different enough that people who only enjoy one shouldn’t be forced to do the other. I mean, at a deeper level the problem is the one above (the game’s reliance on the “ilevel race” and the need to reach your point cap or be at a disadvantage), but solving that would need a major philosophy change, so the least they can do is let people get through the grind in the least “grindy” way (for their taste).

  • http://www.facebook.com/lpeace.88 Leo Lamphier

    I LOVE IoC and AV. They are my over all favorite. I would black list EotS and SotA. EotS because I hate being the only defender at the one base we are holding wail all the other people in the group try to cap the flag. When I should be the one capping in the first place being a worgen rogue with double sprint. SotA because I hate having the other team walk over my team all the way to the vault. Wail My team cant get the first gate down because we don’t try to get 4 tanks on 1 gate like we should. IoC and AV are the only BG’s Alliance wins consistently at least on my sever that is. Plus IoC is just out right fun. The change I would like to see made to PvP is an Ilvl check like they have for heroic dungeons. To keep the hardcore arena/RBG jerks from going in and farming honor on the groups with some/little/no PvP gear. I don’t even know why the do that. If you and your whole team are in full conquest gear why do you want honor at all? 

  • Erik Jonsson

    the last 2 epsiodes i haven’t been able to hear what gary is saying before the intro..

  • thegoodidea

    I got hacked. Not afraid to admit I didn’t have an authenticator….definitely do now. Lost everything. They even deleted my barbarian which was lvl 49 at the time. I just restored it, earned money, bought gear equivalent if not better than what I had from the AH, and moved on. /shrug
    If anyone got “hacked” and lied about having an authenticator….grow up, don’t lie to cover your stupidity T__T

  • jaymon1579

    Yeah I think most that got D3 hacked didn’t have proper security/authenticators, some have hate for the game just for the fact its online only (no offline play) and a few still probably mad over the real $ AH (even though it’s not available yet) and other reasons I’m sure too to hate. So many will lie just to try and make it sound worse or try & cover themselves for not having proper authenticators.

    I quit WoW a while back but kept the keychain authenticator attached to my account for the safety of my account info & guild/friends still in game. If people quit & removed it, then it won’t do any good. They also said the dial in authenticator won’t work with D3, you shouldn’t be using that long term anyway as it’s not as good or reliable as the smart phone/keychain versions.

    Never got hacked but had bought an authenticator when they were introduced, better to be ready before it happens I thought. It’s the same as saying I don’t need anti-virus software because I know what I’m doing & a PC expert so I know what sites to avoid. Just too dangerous to think like that considering how many infected sites/PCs there are out there.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_IL7J7A3V2ZNIXCQ7LSOJGTH5RY Rizen

    d3 is full of bots.

    • Old Ben

      Hey, look at it this way, they’re still smarter than most real WoW players. ;-)

      • http://twitter.com/dularr Dularr

        lol, says the poster to a WoW show.

        • Old Ben

          …which is where comments about WoW make sense, no? Where do you normally write comments about WoW? On forums about Halo?

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Hamad-Ali-Al-Jalahma/512893526 Hamad Ali Al-Jalahma

    “Your just filling in for MikeB ” xD

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/4HXTBJUODWQGVFHYHLTD44U5R4 Tony

    they need to stop this clap and and cheer crap

  • http://www.facebook.com/malek.toumi1 Malek Toumi

    those intros are getting annoying

  • Elusive Fox

    with the RMAH it is more than just security, right now the AH is sub par at best and buggy and unusable at worst.  I think it has been hotfixed out with all the work but for a day or so it was possible to dupe items using the AH, and I doubt they wanted to go live with RMAH with the state of the current AH.

  • http://justgizzmo.com/ Michael

    Ok that audience track is getting a bit annoying.

    • pandora005

      extremely!

  • pandora005

    Blizzard needs to change the “rest of the world” in the same way GW2 does it. The current static zones are boring and there should be this awesome rivalry between horde and alliance going around. The technology is there as their awesome phasing quests showed during the last expansion, all that remains is for Blizzard to actually DO IT. They simply need to not worry about screwing up people still leveling in zone X. Just screw with them since life isnt fair and easy anyways.

    • http://www.kaiketsu.enjin.com/ Corey Jenkins

       One of the main reasons it would be hard for them to do that is because the game engine they are using is really old. Its basically the same engine as Warcraft 3 just with some added tweak.So even if they wanted to do that, they might have limits with the actual engine that prevents them from implementing that type of system in WoW currently. But they could probably do it for Titan if that’s something they are looking towards.

  • Revanhavoc

    Let’s be honest here…

    Mike S is a starter on the team.

    That other guy is just a bench player.

  • Ric Aldrich

    Well….the show still sucks cya

RECOMMENDED FOR YOU
Take a Poll

What Is Your Most Anticipated MMO?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
Monday
6 pst

The Republic

Star Wars The Old Republic

Tuesday
9:30 pst

After Dark

Live Call In Show

n/a

Monty's Minute

Have Questions? He Has Answers

Wednesday
3 pst

OMGLOL

League Of Legends Drama

6 pst

Guildcast

Guild Wars 2

8 pst

Klaus & Squirrel

Gameplay Duo

Thursday
8 pst

Legendary

World of WarCraft

Friday
3 pst

TWIMMO

This Week In MMO



TOP GAMES
Guild Wars 2 MMO News
Genre: MMORPG Fantasy
Developer: Arenanet
Metacritic Score: 90
The Elder Scrolls Online MMORPG News
Genre: MMORPG Fantasy
Developer: Zenimax
Metacritic Score: n/a
World of Warcraft MMO News
Genre: MMORPG Fantasy
Developer: Blizzard
Metacritic Score: 82
SWTOR MMO News
Genre: MMORPG SciFi
Developer: Bioware
Metacritic Score: 85
League of Legends News
Genre: MOBA
Developer: Riot
Metacritic Score: 78